Hobie Forums
http://www.hobie.com/au/en/forums/

Performance: rigid versus inflatable?
http://www.hobie.com/au/en/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=33215
Page 1 of 1

Author:  SquireM [ Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Performance: rigid versus inflatable?

It seems like the inflatable i14t is very close to my "ideal" boat. Just one question: Are there big performance differences between a rigid and inflatable for equivalent boats? I've paddled both (rigid and inflatable, but not Hobie) but in different circumstances and never side by side. Also relevant perhaps, I will be paddling alone (a tandem boat) about half the time.
All thoughts welcome. Thanks.

Author:  Roadrunner [ Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Performance: rigid versus inflatable?

It depends on what you're comparing. Pedal drive is generally faster over distance than paddling. The Hobie Outfitter would probably be marginally faster, being narrower but shorter and having a "firm" hull. The Oasis is about 1/2 MPH +/- faster.

Nevertheless, the tandem handles well solo and moves along quite nicely.

Image

Image

You mentioned paddling. You should know that although the inflatables are excellent pedalers (and fun sailers), they are not very good paddlers. 8)

Author:  Thinwater skinner [ Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Performance: rigid versus inflatable?

It would be nice if Hobie would install a third set of loops to secure a seat in the middle of the i14 for single person operation. Just a thought.

I would perfer a rigid yak over an inflatable if that is all you are comparing. But the inflatable is easier to haul an store. Sooooooooo there are many things to consider..

I think the rigid would be a dryer ride too. Sit up higher in the rigid. In the i14 you are sitting on the deck with only about one inch of pading for the seat. UNLESS you install an extra cushion in the seat to sit on.

Good luck.

PS... everyone above has giving you very good advice too

Author:  Roadrunner [ Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Performance: rigid versus inflatable?

A third seating position would require a third drivewell and some complications in folding the boat. Soloing from the back is not a problem though -- no ballast necessary. I use a square boat cushion under the seat bottom -- works well.

I agree, the portability, compact storage and ease of loading of the inflatables are some of their best features. Their stability and capacity are fantastic. With their adjustable seating, they can accommodate a much taller person than the hard shells (except for the PA). They definitely have their place! 8)

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/