stringy wrote:
Your raked mast sounds interesting Roadrunner!
Any more details?
I haven't mentioned much about it because it has some serious limitations: I'm sure it voids the warranty on the Drive, is less reliable and has some operational limitations. I'm willing to take these risks, but am not recommending it. With that understood, here's the development, which I'll keep buried in this thread with apologies to Andy for going off topic.
In an effort to keep up with you younger, faster guys, I've been experimenting for the past couple of years with allowing the fins more degrees of freedom to twist (have posted a couple of times on this with seemingly no interest from the forum). Raking the masts forward allows this to be carried out to a larger degree and with greater smoothness. It also theoretically improves the sweep angle of the fins. Here's what it looks like on paper for comparison purposes:
The standard fin position is outlined on the right here; the "racing" rake angle is shown in the middle; and I also tried an "extreme" version running 90 degrees perpendicular to the Drive axis, depicted here on the left.
This next shot shows what the raked fins actually look like. Notice how the fin clews are pulled away from their sprockets:
This provides control over the fin angle at the root, or fin pitch. This next view shows the linkage I use to span the gap. Fine tuning is done with the threaded mast adjustment:
Pluses: I constantly get about 0.1+ MPH improved speed (at fast cruise) with either modification in conjunction with the original (slightly stiffer) Turbofins. They do operate more efficiently than the factory configuration.
Minuses: The "extreme" rake version frequently scoops air with the Adventure in all but flat water, but not with the Oasis where it is mounted lower in the water. Both are worse at shedding kelp than the factory design (which is why they are angled back in the first place). Both experimental mast angles are off-axis and impose a huge twisting load on the sprocket holes which they are not designed for. They need to be monitored after each use. I managed to throw fins using a weaker epoxy than I currently use on the "racing" set, losing a fin. I have had surprising success on the "extreme" set with threaded masts using Locktite
Red ("permanent" thread lock) so far. Recently I unraveled my lock ring links on a sprint with the "extreme" set, throwing both fins and losing one -- again.
There is a point of diminishing returns with increased pitch. The greater pitch angles shorten the effective stroke length as the fin uses up more of the stroke to reverse direction.
Bottom line -- more speed but less reliability and not worth it for most users. I'm still working on it.
Quote:
Also, I meant to ask this before but if you have broken the V2 threaded mast how did you manage to get the remaining mast stub out? I'm guessing it broke at the end of the threads?
I was thinking the only way would be to use an easy-out type tool designed for broken bolts. Drill a hole, screw the reverse threaded easy-out in and unscrew the stub. I wonder if this would work though after reading how difficult it is to remove the unbroken V2 mast?
These masts are really tough steel and they're really in there! I think there is a good chance the Easy Out would break off, so I never even tried to extract the stub, figuring it was a waste of effort.