Quote:
I thought the boards on the cat were along the CL axis. If that is the case you are saying the side slip induces a 5 degree (more or less) incidence angle, do I read that right?
Yes - although I would venture to say that 5 deg is the maximum.
To explain the "hard to handle" aspect:
The amount of lifting force from the daggerboard is proportional to the incidence angle and the area of the foil (at small incidence angles).
For a fixed lifting force, you can either have a large area/small angle or a smaller area / larger angle.
When headed downwind, the incidence angle is small to begin with, since not a whole lot of lifting force is required to keep the boat from side-slipping.
With the board fully down (large area),
very small changes in the incidence angle produce large changes in lifting force. These large dynamic swings are what makes the boat hard to control, because you are trying to balance the rig forces to the hull/foil forces by steering and/or sheeting (essentially changing the incidence angle of the sails).
With the board partway down, changes in the incidence angle do not produce large dynamic swings in the lifting force, therefore, it's easier to balance the rig forces without having hair-trigger reaction times.
Jibing boards are a whole other topic. Suffice it to say that they are designed to "twist" in their trunks to produce more lift at a lower incidence angle. You could accompish the same thing with an asymetrical daggerboard.