augaug wrote:
...Or at least take a few statistics courses...
I made no mention of how many kayaking minutes were spent with dogs, cars, or lightning because I was not posting a statistical analysis of the risk factors per the amount of time spent in any activity. I shared interesting Data to compare the relative danger based on overall injuries and deaths in the United States, related to dogs, cars, and lightning. To turn this into a "I'm statistically smarter than you are," and "your data is flawed," type conversation is immature. I provided verifiable facts - you did not.
I respect lightning but I will not stay inside all day because there is a 20% chance or a 90% chance of a thunderstorm. 310 million people in the US and only 241 were injured by lightning in one year, compared to 885,000 dog bite injuries and 2,300,000 automobile injuries? Based on those numbers, lightning poses the least risk to me regardless of what I am doing.
A woman named Linda Cooper who lives in Florida, has been struck by lightning four times. She was struck the first time in front of a post office, the second time while making a phone call at home, the third time while washing dishes (the lightning traveled from the sink to her arms) and the last time through an open car window.
The moral here is no place is "safe" from lightning - it can hit cars, go through buildings and walls, and leap across the air, and go bouncing in the form of a ball to wherever it wants to go. I've seen it shred a tree, and blow out bricks from a home.
With reference to kayaking in lightning storms, there are places you can kayak to minimize your risk of being hit by lightning, just as there are places you can kayak to increase the odds of getting hit. If you don't know one from the other, then by all means, do not kayak during a lightning storm.
Based on the provided injury facts, I still believe I'm much safer pedaling on the water (wisely) in a lightning storm, than I am pedaling on the road (dog bites), or driving to a launch site (car accidents).