A company can't be all things to all people. In looking at priorities, you have to first look at the company's purpose or mission. In Hobie's case, it seems to be
fun on the water. Looking at it's scope, there is a strong surfing and sailing heritage. Finally, looking at its resources, it's present facility is running at capacity, with major physical restraints to plant expansion.
A lot of Hobie's success has been in creating new markets that it can uniquely capitalize on. The Mirage drive, integrating sailing with kayaking, the sidekick, the AI.... It has wisely avoided chasing the industry in areas that have been well established. To that end, a lot of their resources go into R & D.
Would an 18'+ kayak better meet their corporate goals better than any of their present line-up? I would think not. Why? 1) There are
relatively few 18'+ kayakers out there. 2) the versatility of use goes down as the length goes up (versatility is a key element in their present line-up). 3) Can their existing ovens handle that length? Don't know, but it may be a significant factor.
As to giving up the cargo bay for an enclosed hatch, it doesn't really make sense from their point of view. On the contrary, the evolution of the open cargo bay has been a great innovative replacement for closed storage! Camping gear, scuba tanks, bait tanks, easier access to a host of gear -- versatile, simple, inexpensive. Why, you can even bring your dog along!
The best Hobie could hope to offer, as I see it, would be a pod insert as a cargo well accessory. Even then, is there enough market to justify the resource cost?
So if a more specific product is needed for certain pelagic endeavors, if specialized materials are required for weight or abrasion considerations, if larger sails are desired, these may be beyond Hobie's scope (or capabilities). Specialty or custom manufacturers could be better suited to such needs.
Of course, I could be wrong about all this. Hobie knows their business better than anybody -- especially me! Just my 2 cents (at most!).
