This is in reference to Aloha Dan's (and others) recent posts about problems with the plastic supports for the mast in the newer Mirage Drives, both here and over on KFS. Turns out that I too have noticed what has seemed to me to be a reduction in quality of parts and construction of the Mirage Drives over just the past 1-2 years. I first noticed what seemed to be a reduction in weight of the Mirage drive between Jan., 2004 when I purchased my Outback new and July, 2005 when I purchased a new Sport for my wife. Upon closer examination of both Mirage Drives, it became clear that stainless steel parts (including the sprocket and teeth that the chain rides on) on the bearing surfaces of my 2004 OB drive had been replaced with plastic on the 2005 Sport drive! Here are a few pics for comparison so you can see what I am talking about.
1. Here is a pic of both drives, with the 2004 drive to the left and the 2005 drive at the right, fins up, forward part of drive (Pitot tube speedometer holder) to the left.
2. If you zoom in on the 2004 drive on the left above, you will note the stainless steel holders for the masts. Note also that the leading edge of each mast is secured by a SS cotter pin -no way the mast can become separated from the drive (unless the cotter pin breaks!) since the cotter pin goes all the way thru both the holder and the mast itself. No use of set screws anywhere here that are embedded in plastic (that can break or become stripped) to hold the mast tight.
3. Here is the 2005-2006 arrangement in which the former SS mast holders have been replaced by plastic, as has the steel sprocket beneath the new sprocket guards. So what we have now are plastic sprocket teeth (like the sprocket teeth on a bicycle pedal assembly) driving the steel chain that operates the fins on the Mirage Drive.
4. Here is the opposite side of the 2005 drive (rear of drive to the left, fins up) showing how the after part of the fins is secured by SS pins that are held in place with a split ring-same as for the 2004 drive. This seems to be a simple, yet functional way to do this. The problem is in the forward attachment of the fins that are now using plastic, instead of stainless steel, in the newer drives.
SUMMARY
So what is the bottom line to all this? Very simple. The problem that Aloha Dan and others have reported could be solved by replacing the newer plastic mast receptacles and returning to perhaps the older design using stainless steel mast holders that will hold the masts (and fins) to the drive more securely, IMHO. So far, I don't believe anyone has reported losing plastic sprocket teeth from the new drives, but as more folks convert over to the new Turbo fins, with the increased stress and strain on the steel chain and plastic sprocket teeth, I am afraid that we are going to be seeing problems here, as well. I should say that I'm a biologist, not an engineer, but I do tend to look at mechanical devices from a bioengineering point of view on occasion. Just my $.03 worth.