As usual, an excellent write up, comparison and summaries.
Thanks
Jcanracer wrote:
Mike, I've got one of each (2013 models) and they are very different kayaks. I've taken both of them inshore (Biscayne Bay to fish for Sea trout) and offshore (3 miles out from shore to fish for Tuna and other Pelagics). I've only sailed the Revo11, have not yet sailed the Outback. With that in mind, here's my 2cents worth:
Revo11 Vs Outback
Fishing
While both are capable fishing craft, the Outback is the winner here due to its 4 rod holders versus the Revo's 2 rod holders, Lowrance ready transducer mount (sadly absent on the Revo11), larger capacity for gear in the trunk and a concave front hatch area which holds a 42" catch bag more comfortably than the short/sharp/convex nose of the Revo11. The Outback's sidetrays are convenient for mounting accessories and temporarily placing a lure or pair of pliers in between lure changes. The Outback is also easier to stand in if sight fishing is your kind of thing. Yes the Revo will get you to the fishing grounds a bit faster, but if you're spending a day fishing seriously, you will appreciate the space in the Outback more.
Advantage: OUTBACK
General navigation
The Revo is a slimmer profile and the sharp bow cuts through the water and waves quite well; The Outback's bow shape crashes into waves and creates a good amount of hull-slap (even inshore). Comparing either Revo (11 or 13) to an Outback, the Revo is faster and more maneuverable. With that slimmer profile comes a bit less stability in the Revo, and if you are someone used to a wider platform it might feel "tippy" until you get used to it. Should your situation require it, you will also find paddling the slimmer revo to be more enjoyable than paddling the Outback.
Advantage: REVO11
Sailing
I'm biased to the above-mentioned streamlined shape of the Revo, and with the right amas, sailing is quite enjoyable. The Outback has better stability than the Revo, but if you are going to use amas regardless, then this point is moot. I do like the fact that the Outback's lower bow hatch location makes the placement of the furler a bit more efficient. In comparison the Revo hatch is in the way of a seamless furler mounting: placing the furler too low makes the hatch inaccessible and placing it too high makes the furler out of plane with the rigging lines and makes furling a chore.
I'd give the edge to Revo, but unofficially so since I haven't personally sailed the outback.
Storage/Portage
I wall mount both kayaks when not in use and they both get lifted overhead to be placed upside down on the car's roof racks. The lighter weight of the Revo11 shines here. The Revo11 is not much shorter than the Outback, but its a bit easier to store and much easier to carry. I use the Revo on days when my lower back has been acting up. Older model Outbacks had one rigid handle and one soft handle, this made lifting overhead difficult due to the weight and the balance point (bow-to-stern) being slightly aft of the handles. The 2015 Outback has two matching rigid handles now, thank god! But it remains to be seen if the balance point has changed.
Advantage: REVO11
Oh I forgot to mention, I'm 5'8" and 210lbs. I fit comfortably in either kayak but the wider cockpit in the Outback is less of a squeeze on the thighs for me. I like having both honestly. I use the Revo11 to sail and fish the bay and I use the Outback to fish offshore. If I had to have only one kayak, I'd have to give some serious thought to a Revo13.
This is just my experience, yours might vary, forgive my rambling!
Enjoy whichever you choose!