Return to Hobie.com
Hobie Forums
It is currently Thu Aug 21, 2025 9:20 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:28 pm 
Offline
Site Rank - Admiral

Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:22 pm
Posts: 263
SabresfortheCup wrote:
Never have I been more disheartened on this forum than after reading mmiller's explanation of Hobie's outlook on the catamaran market and their hesitation to introduce another cat to their product line - or more specifically, a new cat that would take sailors away from the H16 class.


+1

Hobie Gave up

There are a few 16 events that are relevant in the States (NACs, MadCatter, etc etc) but even this boat is dying a slow death. Hobie Div 3 is probably the most active Division in NA and our H16 #s are about half of what they were 5 years ago.

The Pearl or H20 could be/or is still relevant as a modern(ish) Catamaran. All the Engineering is done.

If they don't want to make them, they should licence them.

As I said in the beginning, Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

_________________
H18 '85
H18 '89 "Knotty Passion"
H20 '96 "20/20 Vision"
Fleet 259 Central Coast California


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:29 pm 
Offline
Hobie Approved Guru

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 7:11 pm
Posts: 5198
Location: Detroit, MI
SabresfortheCup wrote:
I think there is a gap in the current catamaran market between H16 and F18.

The F16 fills that gap nicely, as does the new NACRA 15.

Don't think for a minute that the Pearl has the simplicity of an 18. The Pearl is a Tiger, with just a few parts removed or substituted. It still has the Tiger's telephone-pole mast (a beast to step) and most of the strings that a Tiger has - and some the Tiger doesn't have (2nd furler). I'd warrant the Pearl takes every bit as long to go from trailer to water as a Tiger - and the best I ever did with my Tiger was 90 minutes. That's too long for your average Joe that wants to take his boat out for a day sail.

The Tiger was imported to the US consistently from the late '90s to the mid '00s - but even then, there were probably only a few hundred sold in the US, if that. For a long time, it was the F18 to beat. The problem was the F18 class rules changed and the Tiger remained one-design (well, to a point) - and the class was split. Eventually, the one-design Tiger fizzled out in the US. Still going strong in South Africa, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:36 pm 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 10:59 am
Posts: 69
"The F16 fills that gap nicely, as does the new NACRA 15."

so I should buy a Nacra to fill that gap? hmmm....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:39 pm 
Offline
Site Rank - Admiral

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:02 pm
Posts: 188
Location: Lake of the Ozarks
srm wrote:
wscotterwin wrote:
Grrrrrrrr,

The Pearl would sell well in the states......but I've been on this topic before and shut down by those who make these important decisions.....


I agree, we've been down this road before and the discussion never seems to get any farther than that - just a discussion.

IMO, the catamaran (racing) world would benefit from a two person, ONE-DESIGN, entry level, three-sail boat
. The Pearl would likely be an excellent choice. A Hobie 18 spinnaker class (if well implemented) would also likely be an excellent choice. I'm sure I'm not alone in being very interested in spinnaker racing but very dis-interested in Formula racing which tends to be an arms ($$$) race.

sm
Ditto! plus 1 !

Pearl 2-up is prefect for the crews 330 pounds and up

...since we're dreaming
Then bring on the T1 with furling gennaker for the 1-up crowd

and you still have the H16 SE for the hard core group

HCANA racing would be set for quite a while :D

_________________
1984 H16 "Mister Rogers"
1984 H14 "Sundays"
2000 H20 "Jet"
Sheet In, Max Out


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 11:28 pm 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 10:13 am
Posts: 44
Location: France
A Hobie 18 can have straight (stick-in from top) dagger-boards or the pivoting ones with cord and knots. The latter ones allow for a very tiny opening on top of the hulls. Pivoting daggerboards and "straight" hulls (or vice-versa) aren't compatible.

I own a 1997 HC18 Formula with pivoting daggerboards. It's not a Pearl (the Pearl is wider by +/- 15cm/6" and does have very different hulls. The boats are not the same except in length ...

Half of the boats in our club (CV du Touquet, 100% catamaran-oriented, check out the "Catamaran Jump Cup" this weekend here: http://www.cvtouquet.fr/index.php?optio ... 43bc67ec72) are Hobie Wild Cats (a very competitive F18 cat), one Pearl, one Pacific, two HC18 and a lot of HC16 and Dart 18. The Wild Cat is a real success, no question, but next year there will be a first "Flying Phantom" in our club, a foiling cat built here in France and selling for 28.000.- Euro w/o trailer. Check the US-site here: http://www.phantom-international.com/flying-phantom/ THAT my be a threat to catamarans as we know it. I mean ... whew! Once you have seen this, it's difficult to get the kids on our boats.

_________________
information is not knowledge
Hobie 18 Formula, Hobie DuraGlide 10'10
Image


Last edited by Stefan S on Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:04 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Old Salt

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 569
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Just as a terminology note, "daggerboard" only refers to the slide-in type like the Tiger has. Think of putting a dagger into its holster. Centerboard is more of a generic term that covers everything, but once the distinction needs to be made it usually just refers to the pivoting type.

_________________
'00 H16 #104691
'78 H16 #32692 ex-rental [gone]
Old Holsclaw trailer
My Hobie 16 pages


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:38 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 10:13 am
Posts: 44
Location: France
Thank you. As English is not my native language, I apreciate any comment that helps me grow my vocabulary.

Oh - and don't get fooled by the fact that I live and sail in France; I'm German. I just happen to work and live here since - way too long ....

_________________
information is not knowledge
Hobie 18 Formula, Hobie DuraGlide 10'10
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:02 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Old Salt

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 3:15 pm
Posts: 611
Location: Buffalo, NY
MBounds wrote:
The F16 fills that gap nicely, as does the new NACRA 15.

Don't think for a minute that the Pearl has the simplicity of an 18. The Pearl is a Tiger, with just a few parts removed or substituted. It still has the Tiger's telephone-pole mast (a beast to step) and most of the strings that a Tiger has - and some the Tiger doesn't have (2nd furler). I'd warrant the Pearl takes every bit as long to go from trailer to water as a Tiger - and the best I ever did with my Tiger was 90 minutes. That's too long for your average Joe that wants to take his boat out for a day sail.

Point well taken, Matt. I agree, the Tiger (or Pearl) is not overly accessible to the "average Joe" in terms of sailability or setup, and that kind of setup time is a barrier to all but the most dedicated sailors. The Pearl is probably still quite a bit more F18 than what the Hobie 16 & 18 sailors are looking for in a new boat. Even I didn't get out sailing this year as much as I would have liked, having grown tired of the 45-60 mins of setup and teardown with my H18 after just 4 years with the boat. Lack of mast up storage and beachfront access is a driving force in the decline of the sport, as is price.

That's where I think Hobie is making gains with the rotomolded boats, in simplifying the setup and reducing prices. The problem is that they're just not as performance oriented as the 16 & 18. Maybe I'm asking for too much from one boat, but I think the H16 and later the H18 did pretty well at walking that line when introduced. Adjusted for inflation, H14/16/18's were around $6-8k in the late 60's & early 70's. Relatively affordable, but not "watered down" in design either. A modernized version of the H18 - forgiving, stable, versatile, room for 2-4, but also not compromising too much in terms of tunability & performance, and with room to expand with wings & a spinnaker - I think would do very well.

Okay, yeah, maybe I'm dreaming :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:29 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Old Salt

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:13 am
Posts: 1196
Location: Nepean S.C. Ottawa, Canada
The consensus at last weekend's FANFARE Regatta at Nepean SC, (which included the Canadian F18 Championships) was that while the F18's are great, there are elements of an arm's race in that grouping. The 'smaller' boat (currently the H16's) are being muscled out by the technology of new boats. The 'ideal' boat of today is probably the F16, which can be sailed solo or with a crew. That is one nice catamaran......

For the average Joe, the NACRA 17 (Olympic boat) has not been made in large enough volumes to get excited about, and in any event, it's future lies in a FOILING 17.
Dang, another arm's race.

I love the simplicity of the H16....and with the longer forestay, new jib and with EPO3's, they killed me on handicap. Maybe that says something about my racing style?
I'll keep my SX18 for a while yet.

_________________
2015 H16, with spin,
SOLD 1989 Hobie SX18 Sail # 1947 "In Theory..."
'Only two things are infinite, the universe, and human stupidity. But I'm not sure about the former.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Old Salt

Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 4267
Location: Jersey Shore
After looking at some pictures of the Pearl, I would disagree that it is significantly more complex than a standard H18. Most of the complexity that racers put into rigging their boats is self-imposed anyway and I think you could make the argument that there are probably some H16 sailors that take close to 90 minutes to put their boats together too.

If you take away the Hooter, the Pearl looks as simple or even simpler than the typical racing H18. And adding the Hooter doesn't look to add much in the way of complexity - no snuffer to deal with, no halyard/retrieval line - just a spinnaker pole, sail, sheets, and furler line.

Anyway, Hobie made their decision not to bring this boat into the US. In reality, they're probably right. If you look at the price tag (in euros) it equates to roughly $18K. How many sailors are really going to buy one?

All that said, I still feel that there is a void in the market for a true one-design, entry level/fun, spinnaker beach cat. The F16 does not fit the bill - it is neither entry level nor one-design. I think a Hobie designed spinnaker or Hooter (even better!) package for the H18 would fit the bill nicely. I would love to see the class association poll existing H18 racers to see if there is interest in adding a 3rd sail to the H18 - let the sailors decide.

sm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:27 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 10:13 am
Posts: 44
Location: France
srm wrote:
If you look at the price tag (in euros) it equates to roughly $18K. How many sailors are really going to buy one?


Don't forget to discount the VAT (around 20% in most european countries). It is always included in our prices here and mostly excluded in US price offers. But I agree that it isn't a cheap boat. Hobies never are ...

_________________
information is not knowledge
Hobie 18 Formula, Hobie DuraGlide 10'10
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 1:00 pm 
Offline
Site Rank - Admiral

Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 224
I love when someone brings up the Pearl :). It makes me wonder...

How is the T2 doing? (It would be a great sign for the beach cat industry if the T2 took off.)

Why not let USA customers by a Pearl and pay the shipping? (Too expensive?)

Do people still buy Hobie 16s new? There are so many on the used market you can pick one up for like 200 bucks.
If I'm gonna dish out the cash for a new boat, don't I want a more modern design? ie a faster boat.

Truthfully, sailing is not a quickly growing sport, it has steady support form loyal enthusiast. However the hype curve for sailing is long since past, the market simply will not support boats for every niche of sailing. Hobie knows how popular the Pearl is in the UK. They can probably estimate based on UK sales numbers, then figure that the pearl would only sell a fraction as well in USA. Probably the numbers don't work out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:48 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 10:13 am
Posts: 44
Location: France
The T2 is a great (and easy going) cat for a light to mid-weight crew. I had rented a T2 this summer three times (that's what made me buy a cat again) and I really appreciated how easy everything is - especially the rudders that are perfectly balanced and do not pull on your arm all the time.

It is not a very fast cat, and I wouldn't compare it to a HC16. The T2 is way easier to sail, less tricky in waves and so much more comfy to squat on. A lightweight crew with some sports-genes in the DNA will find the HC16 so much more interesting. Everybody else will probably love the T2 - unless he's in my weight-range (260lbs, 6'5")

_________________
information is not knowledge
Hobie 18 Formula, Hobie DuraGlide 10'10
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 5:11 pm 
Offline
Site Rank - Deck Hand

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Vancouver, WA
Stefan S wrote:
The T2 is a great (and easy going) cat for a light to mid-weight crew. I had rented a T2 this summer three times (that's what made me buy a cat again) and I really appreciated how easy everything is - especially the rudders that are perfectly balanced and do not pull on your arm all the time.

It is not a very fast cat, and I wouldn't compare it to a HC16. The T2 is way easier to sail, less tricky in waves and so much more comfy to squat on. A lightweight crew with some sports-genes in the DNA will find the HC16 so much more interesting. Everybody else will probably love the T2 - unless he's in my weight-range (260lbs, 6'5")


Thanks for this information. I do hope the T2 does well, as that might encourage Hobie Cat to produce another performance boat between the HC-16 and the F-18 Wild Cat. I am in your weight range, so I particularly appreciate your mini-review.

Maybe Hobie's future is 100% roto-molded? I notice that many canoe and kayak companies have moved either all expensive layup boats, or all roto-molded. Old Town, one of the largest canoe manufacturers dropped their high end boats a couple years ago. All their boats are heavy polyurethane ones -- except for the super high end legacy wooden ones.

Meanwhile other vendors fill the niche for high end glass boats, like Wenonah, who's entry level boats are over $2,000, or 2X any Old Town.

The H-16 is legacy product. But even large one-design classes come under pressure eventually. And as others have pointed out there are lots and lots of used ones out there.

Hobie has had great success with the Wave, you see them at every beach resort in the world. The Getaway too I think has been pretty successful. And now, perhaps, the T2. The AI and TI are hugely successful.

In North America that only leaves the WIldCat F18. As others have pointed out it's not a one-design boat, even, it's a box-rule. That has both advantages and disadvantages from the manufacturers point of views. I think from Hobie's point of view it's mostly bad.

* They already have had to kill off the Tiger and create the Wild Cat, so the box rule is taking the company further away from building up a second Hobie racing class to augment the 16.

* Your most skilled and committed sailors, the racers, are loyal to their Federation (F18, F16, A-cat) and not any manufacturer. Every event is a competitive sales situation. Hobie's not used to that, and maybe not as good at it as others.

* Anyone looking at the F-18 will, by the nature of the class, also be looking at NACRA's and (in Europe) others as well, and maybe F-16s, which Hobie isn't even a part of. (Because the F-18 experiment hasn't been that great).

And that's part of why I think Hobie is so into the roto-molded side of the business.
On the roto-molded side there is a lot of room to grow: from AI to TI, from Wave to T2 or Getaway. The prices work out OK. if you paid $3,700 for a Bravo or $5,800 for a wave a few years later it's easy to justify $8,300 or so for a Getaway or a T2. And, you really don't have a lot of other boats to look at as alternatives either. (RS has the 16 Cat now, so someone it trying to get in on the action. Interesting that they also chose the rotomolded part of the market). Hobie has dozens of rotomolded kayaks too, their expertise in increasing fast in this area.

NACRA has a 15, 16, 17, 18 and 20 foot glass boats. Their 17 is the Olympic class racer, their 15 is being pushed as a youth trainer. Their whole company looks to be much more racing oriented, and fiberglass boat oriented than Hobie, which has always been a lifestyle company as much as a technology company.

Having grown up around boats and beach cats I still have a strong visceral preference for fiberglass or composite boats over roto-molded. Even when shopping for a canoe or kayak that's what attracts me. Even more so in a sailboat. But that's me. I doubt my daughters would know the difference.

Maybe the market has passed by the whole idea of a high-performance one-design beach cat from Hobie as others have suggested. This is what I see when I look at their product lines.

Now that USA and Europe are re-united it will be interesting to see where they go. I suspect a lot of the boats in the European catalog will be discontinued, as has been explained it's too big and not very lucrative. Maybe the F-18 stays, maybe not. (It doesn't seem to be the dominant boat in the category, in any case, thought quite lovely and competitive by most accounts). Even if Hobie decides to build a next-gen one design racer that is modern, I think there is a good chance it will be a plastic boat, not a fiberglass one.

As much as I personally don't like that idea, it seems to make a lot of sense from what I see the company being successful with today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:45 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Old Salt

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 3:15 pm
Posts: 611
Location: Buffalo, NY
DrZero, I agree with you. I very much prefer a fiberglass boat to a roto-molded one, but perhaps rotomolded is the future of Hobie Cat. It seems to be far cheaper to produce. Personally, I hate the cheap look and feel of a plastic boat, but if Hobie made a performance-oriented roto-molded boat, I bet it would still sell pretty well. I'd be hesitant, but the temptation may prove too much! I know that the plastic isn't as strong or as stiff as fiberglass (nor as repairable), and likely can't handle the stresses as well, but it is lighter and cheaper to produce. With the right design, it has to be possible to build a stronger & stiffer boat, enough to nearly match the H16 or H18 fleets in terms of performance. Similarly, the rig would have to be simple/quick to set up, to appeal to a broad audience, but retain a lot of the tunability of the H16 & H18 classes.

Again, maybe I'm dreaming, but a performance-oriented boat for under $10k? I bet that would sell quite well! The getaway isn't too far off, if you streamline the hulls a bit, add a boom and a larger sail plan, possibly remove the forward trampoline and add in some diamond wires... keep the optional spinnaker, and the wings can stay :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
© Hobie Cat Company. All rights reserved.
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group