d#$dsa wrote:
I currently have some sit-on-top (SOT) kayaks (Wilderness Systems Thresher 155s with rudders) and some sea kayaks (Current Designs Extreme and Storm with rudders). I use the former for fishing and the latter for overnight touring trips and each have their drawbacks; the SOTs are slow (~2.5 mph average) and the sea kayaks (~5 mph average) are dangerous because they are hard to re-enter if capsized.
Would the 2018 Hobie Revolution 16 be the best of both worlds? Stable enough for fishing with the safety of a SOT yet fast enough, and with enough cargo capacity, for long-distance touring?
I have a 2014 Adventure Island which I use primarily for kayaking: I've done over 1,000 miles of paddling and pedaling with it (probably about 40%/60%). I would say the answer to your question is basically yes. A sleek sea kayak is more efficient for paddling, but overall an Island/Revo 16 is hard to beat on net for speed and distance. I upgraded from a standard 14 ft sea kayak, and it just feels much easier to move the Hobie. Being able to go back-and-forth from pedaling to paddling really helps one avoid fatigue. And you can't beat using the power of your legs over arms when you need to go fast or cover distance, or face a stiff-headwind.
I've done a few trips where I will paddle about 25 miles in a day, camp overnight on an island, and come back home the next day. The boat is perfect for that. Lots of room for gear, versatility for long trips. I can pedal faster than most "normal" boats can paddle for sure.
Yes, safety is a big plus for me on a SOT. Reentry is much easier, even shifting your center of gravity by hanging your legs over the sides comes in handy at times. I find there are more places I can enter/exit the boat thanks to its stability. Circumstances like getting out to pull-over beaver dams are much easier.
d#$dsa wrote:
If so would there be any disadvantage to going with the 2018 Adventure Island instead? The outriggers and sail would obviously open up opportunities but I'd want to be in monohull mode a lot of the time and I'm wondering if the Adventure Island in monohull mode has compromises over the Revolution 16 that should push me towards the Revolution 16.
I'm aware that the Adventure Island would come with a weight penalty but beyond that, is it as good or even superior to the Revolution 16 in kayak-only mode?
While I mostly do kayak-mode, I do love converting to the sail-mode and sailing. It really is fun. The AI-1 was so no-compromise in that sense.
I actually originally had a 2009 AI and the well-cracked in 2015. I was going to replace it with a 2015 AI-2. I went to the store and took a look, and tried car-topping it. Man that thing is much bigger. I thought the added size was a problem for my needs. I was very disappointed because I decided to give up the Vantage seat and instead stick with a 2014 (AI-1) hull. I think the AI-2 is a better sailing vessel than the AI-1, but for all-around versitiliy, the AI-1 was better.
If I had to buy a new boat now, I would get the Revo-16, and use the sail kit and sidekicks for a sail. Not the same as an AI-2 for sailing, but a good compromise when kayaking is goal #1. You may want to consider buying a used AI-1 though, too.
d#$dsa wrote:
I paddle over the shallows a lot and make a lot of contact with the ground; does the Revolution 16 rudder 'kick up' straight when it contacts the ground or does it twist, causing the boat to inadvertently enter a turn? It looks as though the Adventure Island's rudder would pop up straight, is that right?
My 2009 hull had a twist-rudder (much preferred), my new one has the straight-up rudder. I do a lot of shallows, and honestly they both kick-up about the same when hitting bottom. The twist works the same in that regard: I never noticed the boat turning when it came up.