I certainly can't argue with anything you say Stringy. I just went in the garage and tried to make my 2011 AI bow flex like you did with your TI. Didn't happen,
i.e., my AI bow did not flex when I put my full weight(185 lb) in front of the front hatch opening. For whatever the reason, the Tandem just does not seem as strong in the hatch area.
Here is a side by side picture of the two bows taken from the Hobie site today, Dec 12, 2014. The Tandem is not quite as clear—perhaps deliberately on Hobie’s part—but, the AI looks wider.

It is interesting that amas of the AI do not reach forward as much as on the pictured TI. The AI also seems as least as “full” in the bow area as the TI. Presumably this will lead to a dryer ride for the 2015 AI compared to previous models.
If the 2015 AI exhibits oil canning in the hatch area, I am going to immediately reinforce the area. You said this was an option:
stringy wrote:
On my to do list is a reinforcement on the inside of the hatch lip that would strengthen it and stop the lip bending inwards, which creates a gap between the hatch seals and the inflexible hatch lid. The spray cover stopped virtually all the water getting in so I haven't bothered with the reinforcement.
Keith
BTW, I only used
one sea kayak with an inner cover/seal. It was neoprene and leaked badly when held under water for a period. It was also a rental kayak a friend of mine used. I've always used a quality fiberglass sea kayak by Current Designs--for all practical purposes mine and my wife's never leaked more than a few drops, even in the roughest water. Bottom line, given the choice between a neoprene inner cover or your nylon, I would take the nylon.